Insider Risk

Insider risk has surfaced as a critical cybersecurity challenge, with about one-third of data breaches tied to internal actors—whether through negligence, compromised credentials, or malicious intent. Unlike traditional insider threat models that focus solely on malicious users, insider risk adopts a data-first approach, recognising that exposure of sensitive information—even accidentally—can jeopardise organisations, employees, and partners.

Recent research reveals 76% of companies faced at least one insider-related incident last year, with remediation costs exceeding $1 million for 29% of enterprises, underscoring the urgent need for proactive strategies that balance security with operational agility.

Cybersecurity Education and Training Begins Here

Start a Free Trial

Here’s how your free trial works:

  • Meet with our cybersecurity experts to assess your environment and identify your threat risk exposure
  • Within 24 hours and minimal configuration, we’ll deploy our solutions for 30 days
  • Experience our technology in action!
  • Receive report outlining your security vulnerabilities to help you take immediate action against cybersecurity attacks

Fill out this form to request a meeting with our cybersecurity experts.

Thank you for your submission.

What Is Insider Risk?

Insider risk refers to the potential for sensitive data exposure—whether accidental, negligent, or malicious—that threatens organisational security, reputation, or compliance, regardless of its source. Unlike insider threats, which focus on human actors (e.g., employees stealing data or falling for phishing scams), insider risk encompasses all pathways that expose critical assets, including misconfigured cloud storage, unsecured APIs, or automated systems processing data without safeguards. This approach prioritises protecting data itself (not just policing user behaviour,) acknowledging that data breaches often stem from overlooked vulnerabilities rather than deliberate malice.

While insider threats are a subset of insider risk (e.g., a disgruntled developer exfiltrating code), insider risk includes non-human factors like third-party vendor errors, AI-driven data mishandling, or legacy systems lacking access controls. Modern frameworks now address these gaps by monitoring data movement patterns rather than solely flagging “risky users”.

Take this scenario, for instance: a healthcare provider’s payroll team accidentally uploads an unencrypted file containing employee Social Security numbers and bank details to a publicly accessible cloud folder. Within hours, cyber criminals exploit the exposed data to commit identity fraud, triggering regulatory fines, customer lawsuits, and reputational damage. Employees face financial harm, while the organisation’s stock drops 12% amid loss of trust.

How Insider Risks Occur

Insider risks materialise through a combination of human behaviour, technological gaps, and process failures, often escalating long before formal breaches occur. Below are common scenarios where these risks manifest:

  • Unsecured cloud storage: Employees storing sensitive files in personal Dropbox or Google Drive accounts—often to bypass corporate security controls.
  • Email misuse: Sending confidential data to personal email accounts (e.g., Gmail) for convenience, risking exposure through phishing or email account compromises.
  • Over-privileged access: Employees with unnecessary permissions accessing intellectual property beyond their role, such as marketing staff viewing HR records.
  • Legacy system vulnerabilities: Outdated software or unpatched APIs (e.g., LinkedIn’s 2021 breach due to misconfigured APIs) enabling unintended data access.
  • Third-party vendor errors: Contractors mishandling credentials or exposing data via insecure channels, as seen in the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack.
  • Malicious credential use: Disgruntled employees exploiting retained access post-termination to steal trade secrets, as in Yahoo’s IP theft case.
  • Misconfigured permissions: Publicly sharing cloud folders containing sensitive data (e.g., healthcare payroll files left unencrypted).
  • Phishing susceptibility: Employees inadvertently granting attackers access via credential-stuffing attacks or fake login pages.

Recent data shows that 9% of employees create insider risk incidents within six months, with 29% of enterprises facing over $1 million in remediation costs. Proactive monitoring of data movement patterns—not just user intent—is critical to intercepting risks before they escalate into breaches.

How to Identify Insider Risk

Insider risk detection requires shifting from user-centric monitoring to a data-first strategy. The File-Vector-User framework—endorsed by enterprises adopting modern risk management—provides a structured approach to pinpoint vulnerabilities while minimising operational disruption.

The File-Vector-User Framework

Component

Focus Area

Key Questions

Example Scenarios

File

Sensitive data identification

What data could harm the organisation if exposed?

Source code, customer PII, merger plans, or regulated health records.

Vector

Data movement patterns

How is data being accessed, transferred, or modified?

Unencrypted cloud uploads, bulk downloads to USB drives, or emails to personal accounts.

User

Behavioural context

Is this activity normal for the user’s role?

Database admins accessing HR files or departing employees exporting client lists.

Component

File

Focus Area

Sensitive data identification

Key Questions

What data could harm the organisation if exposed?

Example Scenarios

Source code, customer PII, merger plans, or regulated health records.

Component

Vector

Focus Area

Data movement patterns

Key Questions

How is data being accessed, transferred, or modified?

Example Scenarios

Unencrypted cloud uploads, bulk downloads to USB drives, or emails to personal accounts.

Component

User

Focus Area

Behavioural context

Key Questions

Is this activity normal for the user’s role?

Example Scenarios

Database admins accessing HR files or departing employees exporting client lists.

File

Focus on identifying critical data that could harm the organisation if exposed—such as customer payment details, intellectual property, or merger plans. Not all data holds equal value; prioritising high-impact assets ensures resources target the most significant risks.

Vector

Examine how data is accessed, transferred, or modified. Unusual movement patterns—like bulk downloads to personal cloud storage, unencrypted email attachments, or automated scripts exporting files—often signal risk long before a breach occurs.

User

Assess whether actions align with an individual’s role. For example, an engineer who accesses proprietary code is routine, but the same engineer suddenly downloading HR records warrants scrutiny. Context, such as an employee’s resignation or role change, adds critical insight.

This model shifts focus from policing employees to safeguarding data pathways. For instance, misconfigured cloud storage (vector) hosting customer contracts (file) poses a risk regardless of whether a user intentionally exploits it. By analysing these three elements holistically, organisations can intercept risks early—whether they stem from accidental exposure, system flaws, or malicious intent.

Managing Insider Risks

Brian Reed, Cybersecurity Evangelist at Proofpoint, shares several warning signs your organisation is at risk for insider threats:

  • “Your employees aren’t trained to fully understand and apply laws, mandates, or regulatory requirements related to their work and that affect the organisation’s security.
  • Your organisation has an inconsistent device policy that leaves employees murky about the steps they should take to ensure the devices they use—both company-issued and BYOD (“bring your own device”)—are always secured.
  • Employees are sending highly confidential data to an unsecured location in the cloud, exposing the organisation to risk.
  • Your organisation’s security policies are regularly disregarded by employees who are attempting to simplify work tasks and improve productivity.”

Insider risk management addresses vulnerabilities before they escalate by combining proactive monitoring, data governance, and behavioural analysis. Key strategies include:

  • Real-time data monitoring: Track file movements across cloud platforms, email, and endpoints to flag anomalies like bulk downloads or transfers to untrusted locations.
  • Behavioural analytics: Establish role-specific activity baselines to detect deviations, such as after-hours database queries or sudden access spikes to sensitive systems.
  • Strict data classification: Label data by sensitivity (public, confidential, restricted) and automate encryption for high-risk assets like customer PII or trade secrets.
  • Access control reviews: Audit permissions quarterly to revoke unnecessary privileges and ensure alignment with job functions.
  • Unified device policies: Enforce consistent security standards for BYOD and corporate devices to prevent shadow IT or unpatched systems.
  • Security-aware workflows: Train teams to recognise risky shortcuts, such as sending files via personal email or storing data in unapproved cloud apps.

By focusing on data pathways—not just user intent—organisations can mitigate risks from misconfigured systems, third-party errors, or accidental exposure. Proactive frameworks prioritise early detection, reducing breach severity and costs.

Examples of Insider Risk

Real-world cases demonstrate how insider risks—whether intentional, accidental, or systemic—can disrupt organizations. Below are five notable examples:

  • Waymo/Uber Trade Secret Theft: In 2016, a Waymo engineer downloaded 14,000 files containing autonomous vehicle secrets before joining Uber. The breach led to a $245 million settlement and exposed gaps in monitoring privileged user activity.
  • Tesla Employee Data Leak: Two former employees leaked 75,000+ staff records and production secrets to media outlets in 2023. The incident revealed flaws in revoking system access post-termination.
  • Boeing Espionage Case: An engineer with foreign ties stole military tech data for decades (1979–2006). The breach underscored the long-term risks of unchecked access to sensitive systems.
  • Twitter Bitcoin Scam: Hackers socially engineered employees to hijack 130 verified accounts, including Elon Musk’s. The 2020 attack highlighted the risks of inadequate employee training against phishing tactics.

These cases illustrate diverse pathways for insider risks, from deliberate theft to systemic oversights, emphasising the need for proactive data monitoring and role-based access controls.

Challenges in Managing Insider Risks

Effectively addressing insider risks requires navigating complex operational and technological landscapes where security must coexist with productivity. Below are key challenges organisations encounter:

Data Volume and Visibility Gaps

The sheer volume of data generated daily—across cloud platforms, collaboration tools, and remote devices—makes it difficult to identify and prioritise sensitive assets. Hybrid work environments further complicate visibility, as critical data flows through personal accounts, third-party apps, and unmonitored channels. Traditional security tools often fail to track unstructured data, such as chat messages or draft documents, leaving gaps for accidental or intentional exposure.

Differentiating Normal vs. Risky Behaviour

Insider activity often overlaps with legitimate work, creating ambiguity. For example, a developer accessing source code repositories is routine, but sudden bulk downloads before resignation may signal theft. Security teams struggle to balance monitoring without overstepping privacy boundaries, leading to false positives that drain resources or missed signals that escalate into breaches. Context—such as job roles, project deadlines, or collaboration patterns—is essential but challenging to analyse consistently.

Balancing Collaboration with Security

Modern workflows rely on seamless data sharing, yet this increases exposure risks. Employees might use unapproved apps to share files quickly, while third-party vendors or AI systems processing data can introduce vulnerabilities. Collaboration tools like Slack or Teams can lead to accidental oversharing, such as sensitive documents posted in public channels. Organisations must enforce safeguards like encryption and access controls without stifling innovation—a delicate equilibrium many find difficult to achieve.

While collaboration drives growth, it expands the attack surface. Risks from third-party vendors, contractors, or automated systems require nuanced policies that protect data without hindering workflows. For instance, granting temporary access to external partners or securing AI-driven data pipelines demands adaptive strategies that traditional perimeter-based security models lack.

Best Practices for Mitigating Insider Risks

Mitigating insider risks requires a blend of technical controls, employee education, and cultural alignment to balance security with productivity. Organisations must prioritise data protection while fostering accountability at every level. Below are actionable strategies to reduce exposure:

  • Establish clear data handling policies: Classify data by sensitivity (public, confidential, restricted) and enforce encryption for high-risk assets like customer PII or intellectual property. Define acceptable use guidelines for email, cloud storage, and collaboration tools to prevent accidental exposure.
  • Implement strict access controls: Adopt the principle of least privilege (PoLP) to restrict access to only what employees need for their roles. Use role-based access controls (RBAC) and multifactor authentication (MFA) to minimise unauthorised access.
  • Conduct regular audits and reviews: Quarterly access reviews and log audits ensure permissions align with job functions and highlight outdated privileges. For example, revoking access promptly during offboarding prevents ex-employees from exploiting retained credentials.
  • Prioritise security awareness training: Train employees to recognise phishing attempts, secure data sharing practices, and reporting protocols. Use simulations (e.g., mock phishing emails) to reinforce vigilance and measure readiness.
  • Deploy behaviour monitoring tools: Leverage User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) to detect anomalies like bulk file downloads or access to unrelated systems. Pair with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tools to block risky data transfers in real time.
  • Enforce encryption standards: Protect data at rest and in transit using AES-256 encryption for sensitive files and communications. Ensure third-party vendors adhere to the same protocols to prevent supply chain leaks.
  • Develop an incident response plan: Define roles for IT, HR, and legal teams to contain breaches, investigate causes, and notify stakeholders swiftly. Conduct drills to test readiness and refine communication workflows.
  • Communicate policies clearly and consistently: “Promoting good communication is another vital step toward mitigating the risk of unintentional insider threats. If your cybersecurity policies are too technical, the average user won’t likely understand how to follow them,” says Stephanie Torto, Senior Product Marketing Manager at Proofpoint. Simplify policies using plain language, visual aids (infographics, videos), and regular reminders through email or internal platforms.

At the end of the day, a proactive culture reduces risks by empowering employees to act as the first line of defence. Encourage reporting of suspicious activity through confidential channels and recognise adherence to policies with incentives like “security champion” awards. By aligning technical safeguards with human accountability, organisations can mitigate risks without stifling collaboration.

How Proofpoint Can Help

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management (ITM) delivers a unified, data-centric solution to mitigate insider risks by combining real-time monitoring of user activity and data movement with behavioural analytics across endpoints, cloud platforms, and collaboration tools. The platform identifies high-risk patterns—from accidental cloud misconfigurations to malicious data exfiltration—using behavioural baselines tailored to roles, enabling early detection of anomalies like unauthorised access or bulk file transfers.

Integrated with Proofpoint’s Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tools, ITM empowers organisations to block risky actions (e.g., unencrypted uploads to personal cloud storage) while educating users through real-time warnings. Cross-functional dashboards streamline incident response, providing security, HR, and legal teams with visual timelines and actionable insights to address vulnerabilities efficiently.

Get in touch to learn more.

Ready to Give Proofpoint a Try?

Start with a free Proofpoint trial.